Starving the Tree of Racism or Reparations on a Psychological Level: How Seemingly Moral Values and Beliefs Feed Racism

Photo by Nadezhda Moryak on Pexels.com

“We know the predator. We see them feed on us. We are aware to starve the beast is our destiny.”
— John Trudell

Dear fellow white men, but I hope others stick around as a Greek chorus.

An honest recognition of this culture’s history of treachery, kidnapping, torture, and murder is needed to read this — an acceptance of the need for cultural and psychological (personal) reparations. This is my starting point. So, I’m essentially only speaking to those white men who recognize this.

But I’m not going to speak of the need for cultural reparations, but only psychological or epistemological repairs. Without this primary reparation of our own damaged psyche, any cultural reparations will be undermined or at least resisted by this lingering sickness.

In other words, I’m arguing that we can’t solely focus on stopping overt racists, or eliminating the racism and sexism baked into our institutions. These are necessary goals of course. But ultimately, we won’t be very helpful if we don’t simultaneously (and primarily) work to expose the subtlest roots of racism in ourselves — in those of us willing to face ourselves or our conflation with a larger system that is still fundamentally corrupt.

And when we dig deeper, we do, in fact, discover that we’re contributing to this violence through our identification with many of this society’s seemingly benign (but in fact toxic) values.


Read More »

Extinction and Responsibility: Why Climate Disaster Might Heal Us Even As it Kills Us

earth

This appeared on Counterpunch.

Alice O’keeffe: “Even if we can’t escape its consequences, it is not too late to escape the mindset that brought us here.”

If climate disaster has left us with no future do we still feel responsible to the earth that outlives us? Or do we say “who cares?”

If we say “who cares?” then our sense of responsibility was never anything more than a moral rule, a business deal of sorts, where we agreed to behave honorably as long as we were allowed to project our egos into future generations. But I think real empathy for a world without us is still possible, and I think it matters in some way that can’t be calculated on a strictly transactional basis.

The possibility of near-term extinction is new, but the underlying dilemma this presents is as old as the Big Bang, or older. Death is death. It comes to the individual as surely as it comes to the species, the planet, and the exploding universe itself. What’s different now is only this onrushing inability to avoid facing this fact. And I think this is a good thing, because it forces a confrontation with the many reductive delusions that have limited our creative participation in the world, which is our responsibility to something more than ourselves. The chief among these limitations has been a strict and too literal image of who we are, an identity that keeps us trapped in a solipsistic circle.Read More »